Last week I did a post about how important it is to understand the law relating to tenancy agreements. Today I have written a short story to demonstrate how adapting tenancy agreements yourself can cause expensive problems. Note that Julie is not a real person and none of the events described actually happened (although they could well have done).
Julie’s inheritance
Last year, Julie inherited a nice little property in Manchester from her great aunt Mary.
She didn’t want to sell it as she had fond memories of staying there as a child. She already had a nice house and a good job in Sheffield, and didn’t want to move, so she decided to rent it out to get a bit of extra income. Julie was a single Mum, so the extra money would be very welcome.
She decided to deal with the letting herself to save money. It seemed quite easy from what she had read about it on the Internet. She found some nice tenants, and used a standard tenancy agreement published by a reputable company, which she found in her local stationers.
The tenants wanted a 12 month term, but she was a bit worried about renting for that length of time to strangers so she added an extra clause saying that the landlord had the option to end the tenancy on a months notice.
The problems start
A few weeks after the tenant had moved in, Julie was told at work that her position was being made redundant, but that if she was prepared to re-locate, she could have a similar job in their Manchester office. This was no problem she told the company, she had a property there she could move in to, but would need a few months to get the tenants out. It was agreed that she would move up there in six months time.
Julie therefore served notice on her tenants, asking them to vacate early under the break clause she had added to the tenancy agreement, and for good measure served a section 21 notice as well. The tenants told her that they were not in a position to move elsewhere unless they were re-housed by the Local Authority and had been told to stay in the property until they were evicted.
Proceedings for possession
At the end of the two months therefore Julie went along to the local court, and issued proceedings for possession. She was a bit surprised when the tenants served a defence saying that they had the right to stay in the property as their tenancy had not ended yet, but assumed that they were just ‘trying it on’.
Julie was devastated therefore to find at the court hearing, that the Judge agreed with them. The notice to end the tenancy, he told her, was invalid, as the break clause in her tenancy agreement was ‘void’ under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations. The reason being that it only allowed the landlord to end the tenancy, and not the tenants. For the clause to be ‘enforceable’ it had to be even handed and give the same rights to both landlord and tenants.
When Julie protested that she was not running a business and so how could these rules apply to her, the Judge said that renting out property was a business occupation, that it would be unfair to treat tenants of different landlords differently, and that so far as he was concerned, the regulations applied.
So the tenants’ defence was correct, their fixed term had not ended yet,. They had another three months still to go.
An expensive mistake
Not only did Julie lose the case, but as the tenants had been represented by a solicitor at court under the legal aid scheme, she was ordered to pay all their legal costs! Which turned out to be surprisingly expensive.
Julie managed to get the tenants out in the end. She served another section 21 notice for the end of the 12 month term, and this time there were no problems.
However the whole exercise cost her a lot of money, particularly as the tenants stopped paying their rent and had run up a massive rent arrears bill before they left. Plus she had to move up to Manchester before the tenants had gone and so had to rent another property short term, which was also rather expensive. Along with two lots of removal expenses and the cost of storing her furniture for six months.
In fact Julie was forced to sell her Sheffield property to cover her expenses, rather than rent it out as she had planned. “If only” she said “I had known more about tenancy agreements, this would never have happened”.
Don’t let it happen to you
Listen to parts 16 and 17 of my tenancy agreements audiobook and you will find out all about the unfair contract terms regulations that tripped Julie up (although break clauses themselves are covered in a later part, part 25). You can download parts16 and 17 free of charge if you sign up to the Your Law Store mailing list (if you are already signed up you should have been emailed a download link).
If you join the mailing link we will also sometimes email you about other products and services we think you may be interested in, but you can unsubscribe at any time (and we won’t give your details to any third parties). So why not give it a go? >> Click here.